|
|
以下是引用[I]MayMeng[/I]在2005-12-15 13:52:02的发言：[BR]”
This is all those international or national animal protection soceity do around world,in USA, UK, Australia, and much more other countries, many international animal protection society has moren than one million $ income every year, they rehome about 100,000 unwanted cats and dogs every year, have you ever think of why they still has policy like this? Is it because what people says they don't love Animals?
Basically its the way to copping of over population of pets, the considration is based on the balance of ecology system.
Have you every think what does the over populated cats or dogs can damage the other animals life? There should not only has human on the earth, and should not only has cats and dogs on the earth as well, every being is just a part of the world.
Have you ever think what will those people hate cats and dogs will do to over populated cats and dogs? they will kill them in any inhuamn way they want or catch them for food.
The problem is do we have better way to solve over population of Cats or dogs when a lots of them has already been breeded?
Below is my experience in Australia, hope this can help some of you:
http://catszone.org/content/austriliafeeling.asp
不需要数这么多国家, 其他国家的东西不等于就一定正确,我对国际性的东西没特别感觉,只有没去过外国的人才会对外国的东西感冒. "They rehome animal..."? This is not "rehome", this is "ridiculous" -- 如果我是流浪动物, 我一定逃走宁愿饿冻死也不让这些伪善的人收容. 那叫什么救助中心?!那叫集中营. 我不会改变看法: 如果你除了弄死它们就没有别的可以干,那么请不要去管它们,因为它们不一定要碰到你才有活路.这个世界还有很多人关心流浪动物, 但如果有人做出杀害动物的行为,例如他们自己不敢用却认为很好用的"安乐死", 就不要以救助动物的假面具出现, 免得误导善良的人去捐款. 自然界有很多动物都没有主人, 我不觉得它们就破坏自然.适者生存,自然界自然有它的规律,找不到食物的动物就会消失减少, 我觉得把流浪动物绝育后放归,会比把它们关起来安乐死要好得多. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2005-12-17 11:58
显身卡
发表于 2005-12-17 12:13
